The Definition Of Science fiction

- Comments (2)

Jonathan McCalmont's latest Futurismic column (Blasphemous Geometries) is online and entitled How to define a genre … and why not to bother...

Scientists have proved that 86.4% of all arguments in genre boil down to disagreements over what does and does not fit within a particular genre or subgenre.

Excellent stuff. Personally I definitely prefer saying "this is what I call Science Fiction" rather than the tick-list definition approach.

Categories :


2 Comments

I quite like Theodore Sturgeon's definition myself:

"A science fiction story is a story built around human beings, with a human problem, and a human solution, which would not have happened at all without its scientific content"

But generally speaking I think arguing about genre definitions are pointless as is the habit of defining every sub-genre and sub-sub-genre.

Then again I'm the guy who likes to say sci-fi just because I know it annoys some people.

James Author Profile Page said:

I do that sci-fi thing too :-)

"scientific content" is surely the contentious phrase? If something is made up, even if it is extrapolated, is it really scientific? Hmmmmm....

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by James published on June 26, 2008 12:38 PM.

Fancy Participating At Worldcon 2009? was the previous entry in this blog.

Post 1991 SciFi Classics? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Possibly of Interest