It took me a long time to read Anathem but it's taken me even longer to write the review. Well, sort of, I haven't spent all of this time writing, just thinking about writing. But now, enough is enough, it's time to write and say what I think about Stephenson's latest, however incoherent the thoughts.Anathem - Neal Stephenson
It took me a long time to read Anathem but it's taken me even longer to write the review. Well, sort of, I haven't spent all of this time writing, just thinking about writing. But now, enough is enough, it's time to write and say what I think about Stephenson's latest, however incoherent the thoughts.The first thing you notice about Anathem is its size and weight, a hefty book, and yet smaller than the combined Baroque Cycle. Nothing new then, given Stephenson's last few books. So let's forget about that.
Upon starting Anathem I was very worried that he'd gone clockpunk, with a long and intensely detailed passage about the workings of mechanical clock. But it isn't clockpunk, it's just the usual attention to detail. Often Stephenson has written books with wild tangents, so whilst the attention to detail is entertaining it is also off-topic (this was most noticeable in Cryptonomicon). Anathem feels more focused, there are pages of debate or explanation or description, but they are important to the plot. And, wonderfully, Anathem is full-on Science Fiction, no debate needed here as to whether it's eligible for a Hugo.
The plot itself takes a while to get going, but it's a crucial amount of time that sets the scene, and lets you live in the world, before things start happening. The third quarter dragged a bit for me but the last quarter has an awesome set piece and some events that will probably be the spark for many debates.
Combined with in-depth discussions of physics, meta-physics and philosophy are many wonderful observations and nuggets of wisdom; the sort of passages I read several times, and then thought about. Passages that felt relevant to me and my life. All of which I have of course now forgotten, but I still get the urges to leaf through the book and look them up.
Despite the science, Anathem also contains some nice characters and genuine emotion. Against all the odds there is even a wonderful, emotional ending. Yes, a proper ending!
All in all it feels a more conventional novel than anything Stephenson has written for a while.
Whist I really did enjoy it, and loved being lost in its many pages, it doesn't quite live up to the best of The Baroque Cycle, in particular The Confusion. But it's Neal Stephenson and it's Science Fiction, so you should read it.
Related Entries
- Feb 3 2010Small Miracles by Edward M. Lerner3
- Apr 28 20092009 Locus Award Finalists0
- Nov 26 2008In A Word 26/11/083
- Nov 19 2008Not A Review Of Anathem0
- Nov 14 2008Love & Hate 14/11/20080
- Oct 22 2008Great Neal Stephenson Interview0
- Oct 17 2008Love & Hate 17/10/083
- Oct 16 2008Anathem Discussed On Five Live0
- Oct 10 2008Love & Hate 10/10/080
1 TrackBack
The judges had another good year for reading books, spurred on at the start of the year by an Apocalyptic reading resolution, and then reading most of the Clarke Award nominees. Twenty Five books in all, which is almost one... Read More
I agree... though to leave it with the suggestion that it isn't as satisfying as The Baroque Cycle is like saying your favourite meal isn't as satisfying as your favourite meal three days in a row! Or something like that... crap analogy, but I'm tired and at work (today of all days).
I loved Anathem... the completely different setting, the alternate world and alternate language was all awesome. The ideas he put forward were superb and all made sense come finish. Great book. Definitely one to read again and lives right up there with Baroque and Cryptonomicon for me!